Posted on Leave a comment

Being There ….Part 2 – Picture That

In Being There Part 1 I bewailed the trend of gear collectors and people who buy classic cameras to take pictures of their cat and their back garden. Now it’s time to get on and talk about the photographer as the documenter.
  
Photography has many angles to it but one of the most interesting is the documentary photographer. Documentary work, at its most basic, can be deeply personal like pictures of your family over time but at its peak can scale up to changes of your own environment, your town and the people that inhabit it over time. At its core, documentary work captures moments in time, characters and events.

Documentary photography serves a valuable purpose – it acts as a time vault for later generations to see the past, how people lived, the clothes they wore, the foods they ate and much else besides providing a valuable glimpse for future generations.

The work of documentary photography may take years to compile the shots so it’s critical if this is your area of interest that you run multiple projects and keep these in mind every time you are out with your camera. Currently I am running a whole batch of projects and I don’t expect to have a completed folio in much less than 5 years of any of them. My current projects cover people’s relationships to their smartphones, the plight of the homeless, and my local area and its street life but I also do mini projects like the current film revival. Anything can be grist for the mill.

Homeless Immigrant in Bruges with Kosmo Films Agent Shadow at 800ASA
Homeless Immigrant in Bruges with Kosmo Films Agent Shadow at 800ASA
From my people and phones project now in its third year. Ilford HP5.
From my people and phones project now in its third year. Ilford HP5.
Film Revival Project. Market Trader at Portobello Market. Ilford FP4
Film Revival Project. Market Trader at Portobello Market. Ilford FP4.

Documentary work is painstaking, you need to compile the shots over a long period of time, structure the pictures to tell stories and of course keep everything catalogued. It’s also helpful if you can chat with the subjects and get a bit of back story to add some colour and depth to the photographs or at least some history behind what’s going on in the picture. This is the basis of a photo essay. It all takes time to do but can be very rewarding. Patience is elixir of this kind of work. Both of my main projects have been running for almost 3 years and I am still far away from a completed folio.

Will anyone ever see your work or care? Well one can never know whether the work is valuable. Only time can truly tell and very often photographs are lost and then found again revealing a glimpse of life in a bygone age. Only a few years ago a huge cache of negatives was found showing peasant life in Russia in the 1920s and these provide valuable insights into life, customs and work at the time. Personally, I do this kind of thing because it provides a solid focus and stops me wasting film if I know I am looking for particular shots. It doesn’t stop me taking pictures of other interesting shots but it does provide some structure to my shooting.

If your nervous about photographing people for this kind of work you either have to find the raw nerve and ‘front’, develop a charming demeanour or learn how to be invisible. I use a combination of all three. Sometimes I will just rush in take the picture and retreat if the person looks like they will be hostile, sometimes a smile and a ‘Hi’ will get them smiling and then you can show them the camera and see how they react and other times for candids you need to be invisible. Keep the camera out of sight, pre focus and meter and then just snap or alternately ‘long lens’ them. When working in foreign climes its generally best to adopt the ‘show the camera’ approach because local sensibilities can be very different. You also need some consideration about local conditions. In some environments you will be using a camera that represents 5 years wages to the local population so a good chunk of empathy and understanding is needed as to local sensitivities.

The pre-focus and meter and snap it off approach. Homeless person in argument with street warden. Ilford FP4.
The pre-focus and meter and snap it off approach. Person in animated argument with street warden. Ilford FP4.
Shoot a few blanks until they go natural and then shoot. Christmas Market in Bruges.  Agent Shadow at 400.
Shoot a few blanks until they go natural and then shoot. Christmas Market in Bruges. Agent Shadow at 400.
Stealthy - keeping the camera out of sight, prefocus and meter. Ilford HP5.
Stealthy – keeping the camera out of sight, prefocus and meter. Ilford HP5.
Language barrier? No problems, show them the camera and if they smile and nod its ok. Gate guard on Kos. Ilford FP4.
Language barrier? No problems, show them the camera and if they smile and nod its ok. Gate guard on Kos. Ilford FP4.

Getting it ‘natural’ is also a challenge when photographing people for documentary work. Anyone who has owned a camera for more than a week will realise that when you photograph people they tend to ‘freeze’, they go rigid and ‘unnatural’ and the art is to make it look like everyday life. You can adopt the approaches I mentioned but you can also just chat with people, keep the camera in view and your eye in but don’t be shooting. Just let them get used to the camera being there and eventually in a few minutes they will relax and forget the camera is even there and that’s when you start shooting. It’s a tricky act to keep a conversation flow going while working with a camera and it really only comes from experience and knowing your camera well enough to be able to run yourself in ‘Auto’ mode.

Eugene Smith used this approach in his photo essay ‘A Country Doctor’ for Time Life. He spent a month going around with the doctor and shooting an empty camera to acclimatise people to his presence and the camera and if you want to see excellent documentary photography you could do worse than look up Eugene Smith’s work. Mentioning Eugene Smith it’s the perfect example of photography not being about the gear but about the ability. So many amateur photographers are more obsessed about the hardware than they are about actually taking good pictures. Eugene’s Minamata series is amazing and mostly shot with quite low end cameras by todays standards. I have purposely not added what kit was used to each of the photos in this article in a probably hopeless attempt to stop gear-heads thinking the camera is what makes the pics and then rushing out to buy the same camera. Trust me they were all shot on pretty basic vintage cameras using very far from top end lenses – mostly a standard 50mm lens.

One of the most beautiful pieces of documentary work I have seen recently comes from Chuck Fong. Chuck has spent an immense amount of time documenting the American Diner and has published a book called ‘Dinor Bleu – The Vanishing American Diner’ which is a rich tapestry of this vanishing piece of Americana. The photographs are beautiful and cover a huge range of styles that give you a generous portion of the slice of life (and a good dose of inspiration too!). It’s this kind of work that gives a real insight into a whole sub-culture as well as providing some very beautiful images and Chuck has used a wide variety of styles. If you are looking for inspiration to get a project going then Chucks work should light a fuse under you.

Dinor Bleu - The Vanishing American Diner
Dinor Bleu - The Vanishing American Diner
Dinor Bleu - The Vanishing American Diner
Dinor Bleu - The Vanishing American Diner
Dinor Bleu - The Vanishing American Diner
Dinor Bleu - The Vanishing American Diner

I was most inspired in my own documentary work by National Geographic pictures of locations and their rich coverage of places, people and events. We cant all be afforded that capability but a solid project need not take you too far or, like Chucks work on American Diners, can be done over an extended period of time.

Even a humble holiday can yield results, don’t snap away at the local landmarks along with the other grockles, get one or two positioning shots and then look for the small stuff and the local people to add colour and context. I mentioned in Part 1 of ‘Being There’ that travel will almost always provide better opportunities. You don’t have to go to Outer Mongolia but you can spend a long weekend somewhere looking for, and getting, pictures for far less than the latest gizmo.
I use holidays and breaks as a kind of mini documentary. I’ll get some landscapes and picture postcard stuff but I’ll really be looking for the stories in a place.

Monschau
Monschau, Germany – its hard to get a bad shot here. This was taken with Fuji 400 and a polariser to really load those colours
Bruges
Bruges, one of my favourite haunts for photography. Cinestill 800 with a daylight correction filter.
When visiting places make sure to get the local color which will be often more interesting than buildings. Street performers in Monschau. Agfa APX400.
When visiting places make sure to get the local color which will be usually more interesting than buildings. Street performers in Monschau. Agfa APX400.
Look for the 'off the map' stuff. This is a disused factory in Solingen. Kosmo Agent Shadow at 400.
Look for the ‘off the map’ stuff. This is a disused factory in Solingen. Kosmo Agent Shadow at 400.

A solid project in mind like a documentary set of pictures will push your skills, keep you focused, keep you out of the comfort zone and hopefully improve your photography.

Go away now and aim to get some pictures that really pop in 2025. It’s never too late to make a New Years resolution so make yours about getting some good shots.

Picture at the top of the article was a Beijing street shot with a Lumix TZ80, converted to black and white and post processed for contrast adjustment. Shot ‘on the fly’ so as not to spook the subjects.



Posted on 7 Comments

Film is expensive, or is it?

The price of film

Film is expensive: – The increasing cost of film is often much complained about on film photography forums with people endlessly binding on about how it’s daft to keep shooting when film costs are so exorbitant. Devotees of the art (craft, science, technology – pic your preferred nomenclature) seem to be constantly complaining about the price of film.

Recently I ran into a very long diatribe from a certain Mr Leas.  The full text of this is towards the end of this article but it starts with a complaint that just as film cameras are becoming more affordable the price of film is going skywards.

He wrote to complain about the rising cost of living, inflationary pressures and points out that until quite recently film was rather inexpensive but now, as a result of rising prices,  photographers may be restricted  – shoot less, be more selective about what they shoot, stop bracketing shots etc.

None of this will be unfamiliar to anyone who has paid even scant attention to film forums and, the occasional plea for sanity because, at the end of the day it really isn’t THAT expensive, tends to get ignored in the welter of people crying over increased costs.

What makes Mr Leas diatribe so interesting though is that it was written in 1980! 20 years before digital became a significant force and when the film photography industry was at its zenith. It really does seem as if there is nothing new under the sun doesn’t it? Moaning about stuff is, I have long suspected, a very human trait.

Amateur Photographer Old Issues


I bought a pile of old Amateur Photographer magazines, mostly for some early test results on cameras and also to validate a feeling that film really wasn’t that much more expensive today than it was back in the halcyon 70s and 80s – or was it? Having done some rough math and been shouted at on forums with people’s hazy recollections of when film was handed out free (not really but some people do have a faulty recollection for sure) about how it WAS more expensive today than ever before I thought I’d do some research and find the truth rather than rely on my own (possibly faulty) memory. Peoples recollections are often faulty and people of a certain age tend to carp on about how when they were young everything was less expensive. I do it myself at times as I am of that certain age when you start boring strangers with how everything was better in the good old days.

So putting down my repair tools and putting my two bladed propellor research hat on I combed through several magazines from the 1980s.  Now this is trickier than you may think because many films are out of production, some films have changed formulas and some films have been replaced by later versions of the original film so it’s rather tough to draw direct comparisons.

In the end I settled for those old standbys – Ilford, Kodak and Fuji.  I took sample prices, averaged them out and then I ran the 1980s prices through the Bank of Englands inflation calculator to see what the price would look like today and then compared that to current online prices.

Here’s what I found…

The cost of black and white film
For the black and white shooter It’s gotten a bit more expensive but not so much you’d really notice and there are alternatives….

Ilford FP4 (36 Exposures) Black and White

In 1980 a roll of FP4 would cost somewhere between £1.50 and £1.43 but the lower price is from mail order so you would be stuck with postage costs.  The price in a retail outlet would have been £1.50 – you could get it cheaper if you were prepared to buy 10 rolls mail order and the price would then go down to. £1.24 per roll. The BoE inflation calculator gives a price (based on the £1.50 figure which is more typical of retail shops) as costing £6.12 in todays money.  The actual price you would pay today would be £6.50 based on the best deal you could get online. But, you could chip that price down by buying 3 or 10 rolls from online outlets.
Pricing on all film stock is somewhat skewed by eBay and Amazon scalpers who are quick to ride any trend.

RESULT– its gone up by a whopping 38p – a 6.2% Increase

If 38p is likely to drive you into penury then you’d best start tightening your belt and sell that classic camera. I’ll take it off your hands just let me know where to come to pick it up.

Ilford HP5 (36 Exposures)Black and White


In 1980 you would have been paying the same for HP5 as FP4 – so £1.50 a roll.  All the same provisos as FP4 apply and the BoE calculator gives a price today of £6.12 – Same as FP4 BUT you would now be paying £6.79.  It’s slightly more expensive than FP4 but the same applies to bulk deals.  You could buy 3 or 10 rolls and equalise the price.

Like FP4 its slightly more expensive but you need to consider the volumes for film sales have gone down.  Like any commodity the price rises as the production volume falls. Considering the comparison is between a time when film was being produced in vast bulk and today where it’s a speciality product the price rises are really not that much.

RESULT– its gone up by 67p which is a nearly 11% increase

If you really do feel you can’t afford an extra 50p a roll on a bulk buy then there are excellent alternative films like Kosmo Foto, Kentmere, Orwo and plenty of others.

The cost of shooting with color film
The cost of colour film has gone up and for some of the exotics films prices really have shifted but there are still good deals out there.

Kodacolor II 400 (36 Exposures) Colour

It’s not around anymore but I wanted a sample of colour prices to compare with. Its nearest relative would be Kodak Gold 400 these days.
So how does the pricing look?

Back in 1980 a retail outlet would charge you £2.25 for a roll. Mail order would be charging anywhere between £1.72 and £2.26 depending on volume. Just like with the Ilford films some of the mail order companies could trim the price if you ordered 10 rolls. Running that price through the BoE calculator give you a price of £9.18 in todays money. You could acquire a roll online these days for around £10 but you could get it cheaper if you bought in bulk. I found one store that would haircut the price to around £5 plus postage if you bought 10 rolls.

So just like the Ilford films Kodak colour gone up marginally BUT if you were happy to shell out for 10 rolls the cost of film might actually be cheaper!

RESULT– It’s more expensive with a 9% rise equivalent to almost an entire pound

Shocking, I mean how can anyone who’ just shelled out £200+ on a classic camera possibly be expected to find an extra £1!
On the other hand you can shop around and buy bulk and actually get it for LESS than it cost back then.

Fuji Color 400 (36 Exposures) Colour

Fuji was hard to get a handle on. Believe it or not very few dealers were selling Fuji in 1980, at least from the adverts in photography magazines. The only dealer I could find in 1980 with an advert was selling a 36 roll of Fuji Color 400 for £1.95.  Goodness that was cheap back then – barely more than a black and white roll. Possibly because most Japanese companies when they enter a market price very aggressively to force out competitors and build a base of users. The Fuji price was clearly undercutting Kodak back in the 1980s. Putting that number into the BoE calculator would give a price today of £7.95 but as we all know you’d be lucky to lay hands on Fuji 400 Color today for less than £14.99.

Theres two reasons for that. The first is having captured the market and become the darling of colour films Fuji upped the price back in the ‘used to be’. It became quite an expensive film in time – more expensive that Kodak in the late 1980s.  The second reason is today the eBay scalpers are hard at work. It’s in short supply which means people are charging over the odds.
Before the axe fell when Fuji moved production and subsequently disrupted supply (and said they were quitting film – before they woke up and smelled the acetate) I bulk bought Fuji Superia 400 at £9.99 a year ago- only £2 more expensive (equivalent to a 21% increase).  I don’t doubt it will get back there again once Fuji start fulfilling on volumes again now that they have moved production to the USA.

RESULT– It’s more expensive with a 21% rise equivalent to £2 if you could bulk buy otherwise it really has gone ballistic with around 100% price rise if you buy online from a scalper assuming you can even get it

Fuji was often the more expensive option even back in the Golden Age. But you can trim the price with a bulk buy or use the more modern Kodak films which are really very good.

Kosmo Films
Its not all bleak… there are new arrivals like Kosmo Fotos Agent Shadow which is really excellent when handled well.

Mr Leas writes…(March 1980)

That letter in full as promised is below– tell me if this isn’t the same song that the modern film photographer often sings at every opportunity… read on for how bad things could be in the good old bad old days and if you want to see how film prices have fluctuated over a large time scale read Mike Eckmans article which is far more exhaustive than this one and covers film prices from the dawn of film photography.

It seems ironic that just at the time when the purchase price of many of the most desirable cameras has dropped considerably (for example, Nikon EM, originally advertised at £150 has been advertised at under £100) (don’t we all wish that were so today – Mel) the cost of films and printing papers has had to rise dramatically.

Because of the greatly increased price of silver, couple with inflation etc, we all face the setback of very likely having to reduce the actual numbers of pictures we can afford to take with our super lower-priced cameras. I do not yet know by how much35mm films are due to rise but I have been informed that the printing paper I uses is going up by 50% following a 20% rise just before Christmas.

This letter was sent in March – see things aren’t so bad after all.  Here we are today moaning about piddling 3% rises from Ilford– Mel.

All told, I expect to pay double what was charged just over a year ago.

Since so many other costs are also rising steeply it seems inevitable that many people will have to cut back on their photography, even if you go in for bulk buying.


Until recently most enthusiasts could regard the materials required to make pictures as being reasonably inexpensive. If you found a really good subject you might shoot off several frames at various apertures and from several angles, to obtain the best possible result.


Generally when carrying a camera there was no particular feeling of restraint when subjects that appealed turned up. Obviously this doesn’t apply to everyone, for some people the cost of film has always been a restraining factor, but I am speaking in general terms.


So, too, when working in the darkroom, the cost of paper was not such that one felt unable to use several sheets if necessary to obtain a first-rate result and of course many sheets are used as test strips.


Now, economies will have to be made unless by some means we can all raise our incomes sufficiently (some hopes!). But this may not be altogether a bad thing. It is very tempting, enjoying an outing with ones camera, to shoot a little carelessly rather than take extra care to sum up each subjects merits, the quality of the light etc. (Mr Leas, if he was around today would do well to read my ‘Being There’ articles about just that – Mel). Now there should be a greater incentive to be choosy about subjects, to take the time to find the best angles, not to make do with indifferent lighting and to ensure exposure will be spot on rather than go in for too much bracketing. All this of course to save on precious film.  No one would welcome these steep price increases (least of all those with film gobbling auto winders) but they may well lead to greater care over choosing subject matter and matters concerning technique. So it could be that standards of photography actually rise through a little imposed restraint!

Conclusion
So there you are – film IS more expensive, but as you can see from the letter dated March 1980 from Mr Leas, it always was. People were moaning about it 40 years ago, but it’s hardly a huge additional cost in the way that people may have you believe.  Yes – some of the exotic super professional films have gotten expensive – they always were though but I’d rather they were pricey than gone altogether which is the less palatable option.
On the sunny side there are new films coming out all the time, Kodak recently took on another 350 staff to meet the demand, Harman have launched Phoenix (a completely new colour film) and Fuji did eventually wake up and smell the acetate and moved production to the US and hopefully will soon get back in their stride.

I do find it odd though that many modern day film shooters moan and complain about film costs while paying out for expensive gear, buying vast collections of classics and then sitting in what passes for a coffee shop gulping down hot brown water that they just paid twice the price of a roll of film for. There seems a disconnect, possibly even a sense of entitlement, that having acquired a classic camera on the cheap they shouldn’t have to pay for film.  It’s a bit like buying a classic 1960s car and expecting to pay 1960s prices for your petrol.

Here’s another thought – if film really is too expensive for you that’s even more reason to shoot with a reliable and serviced camera. Mr Leas makes a plea in his letter that just maybe people will be more selective about what they shoot. Frankly you always should be – if your just blatting film and hoping then digital really is for you.

With the increasing prices the usual prophets of doom would have you believe that film photography will die.
I don’t think it will anytime soon but without a new film camera coming to market and a kickstart to the whole film photography zeitgeist I very much believe film will eventually just fade away. There simply wont be the cameras to use it in sadly – production volumes for cameras were never as high as people think and many marques and models are now simply impossible to repair. Many will be destroyed by todays throw away society and the pool of viable cameras will shrink without new products coming to market.

 Let’s all keep our finger crossed and hope Pentax are successful in their venture into reduxing a film camera for todays market which may be the best hope to see film make a come back but as you can see it would be unlikely to make film less expensive as its already pretty close to its 1980 pricing levels which, given the vastly reduced demand, is itself something of a minor miracle that we should all be grateful for.

Posted on 2 Comments

Being There……Picture This

Global Warming Protestor

One of the things that drives me mad with many photographers online, and in the flesh very often, is their push for ever more expensive gear but a complete lack of actually GOING somewhere or DOING something with it. 
 
Now I can’t say I am completely devoid of ‘gearhead’ syndrome (also known as Collectivitis and Gear Acquisition Syndrome or GAS) but my own desire is kept in check by always asking the question of myself, ‘Do I need it?’ and critically ‘what could I achieve with this that I can’t achieve with what I have?’ 
 
I have observed, and this is especially true of gearheads riding the retro film Zeitgeist, that their ability to get any good results is often inversely proportional to the quantity of gear they own. 

Some of the villains of this piece include the modern day ‘collectors’. They sit on the internet proudly showing their early 1968 Nikon or classic Rollei and declaiming about the wonders of the German or Japanese camera makers, but never get out there and shoot the bloody things! To me there is nothing sadder than a gearhead with a glass cabinet of wonders that is never shot. I wonder if they ever know (or care) that even in ideal storage conditions, vintage cameras naturally decay. Without regular use the lubricants harden and even with regular use seals decay inside. Being sat inside a glass case is hardly what the cameras makers and builders toiled for. That their amazing design and workmanship should sit in a glass display, like stuffed pheasants. This to me is very sad and reminds me of stuffed animals – glorious in the flesh but utterly diminished by being stuffed and put behind glass.
 

Nikon F and Nikkor Glass
One of my own small collection. A near mint early Nikon F with early non-AI lenses – it’s regularly in use by me and absolutely not a shelf queen.

The key to actually getting pictures, and this was drummed into me years ago by a hoary old press photographer, is actually being somewhere where something is happening or the view is spectacular on in some other way of interest.  His wise counsel, which I have always tried to follow (albeit with some occasional attacks  of collectivitis), was always to spend your money going somewhere where you can get some interesting shots – NOT buying some new wonder kit which enables to you get even better pictures of your cat or your backyard.

Typical of this behaviour is seeing someone on a film group ages ago where a poster did exactly the opposite of my old press packers advice.  The miscreant had a wonderful, array of Hasselblad, Bronicas and Rollies that were used to produce an almost inexhaustible supply of pictures of his cat, his granny, his back garden etc. Sadly some of these were excellently shot but unbelievably dull to look at. I am not a snob about this. If shooting pictures of your cat is what you want to do then you have my complete permission to carry on, however I am  talking about creating meaningful photography not filling a snap shot album for my cat who would struggle to appreciate it not having opposable thumbs. 

Now, none of this means you can’t get good stuff locally.  I am currently working on a couple of projects where I am looking at the plight of the homeless in my local area and I’m always on the lookout for the interesting, the bizarre or the occasional candid.  One of my other projects is covering peoples interactions with their phones. So if you’re on a budget then you can always find a project to work on thats local. No one is suggesting you should sell your kids into slavery to fund a trip to the Bahamas with a Super Model!

Homeless person on streets
Through the eyes of a child… Homelessness in the one of the richest countries in the world.
Woman with cellphone
Praying for a signal? Tourist in Gothic Cathedral struggles
to get a picture or signal or both.

Having a project in mind helps to steer you towards photo opportunities. Wandering around aimlessly will usually just provoke you into using up film taking more bland pictures.  Now a tip here is you won’t find 36 interesting pictures on a single roll. I doubt I have taken 36 killer pictures in my entire life! So you need multiple projects so you can bag what happens as and when. For instance the homeless man was on the same roll as a few other candid pics of other things.

It may be macro is your thing – I was hiking a couple of years ago and ran into a photographer doing macro photography in the middle of nowhere. As he sat there patiently waiting for THE shot he told me the damsel flies were better there than anywhere else. I could only demur at his know how and wished him well. It’s not my thing for sure but the point is he wasn’t trying out his new wonder lens in his backyard he was out there trying for the perfect shot. He had done his research, knew where to go, what time of day and was clearly expert at his work and critically he was THERE.

The curse of gear-itis is it usually acts as a block to creativity. 

Melanie


A lesson well learned, although occasionally forgotten by me, is this.  Many years ago when I was suffering super acute Gear Acquisition Syndrome (GAS) I found my pictures were getting worse.  The usual antidote to this was to buy more gear and I am sure readers will be familiar with this. It goes something like ‘if I could just have a billionth of second shutter speed I could get more interesting pictures’ or ‘if I could have an f.95 lens I’d be able to get better shots’ but the truth is, if you stopped buying gear you’d do better. A long time ago I was young, a bit later on I was a bit less young but had money in my pocket. With cash and a penchant for more gear I slowly started filling a camera bag with filters. Filters would make me creative. Filters would make you look like a pro. Filters would turn the bland into – well the bland actually. The temptation was always to think that a filter would of itself create a good picture. In truth the filters could turn a good picture into a great one but would more often turn a bland picture into an even blander one but this time with some special effects thrown in.

Abandoned railway station in Gosport
Rock bottom – this is probably the epitome of what happens with too much gear. Multiple filters but absolutely bland photography. Yes I’ll admit to it. 28mm lens with 5 filters in play!

Back then, with a bag full of filters and just about every focal length lens that was possible to own I was despairing of getting good shots and seriously wondering what had gone wrong with my photography. Crushed by the the lack of good shots despite the every increasing size of the camera bag I decided to eat some humble pie and seek lessons.  My hoary old ex-press photographer teacher looked over my bulging camera bag with a weary eye and a poorly disguised look of contempt and then handed me a Box Brownie and told me it had a 12 shot black and white roll loaded and not to come back until I had composed 12 good pictures.

Now a box brownie poses some serious challenges.  Fixed lens, fixed focus, fixed f stop and the less than scorching 1/60th second shutter speed.  Cleary speeding cars and long lensing was out.  You simply HAD to look for shots and work hard for them.
 
The lesson it taught me was of course getting a good shot is down to you NOT the camera.  I didn’t succeed in getting 12 cracking shots but it did force me to focus on what’s important and what’s important isn’t actually the gear.  Yes a faster shutter speed will help you if you’re a sports photographer, a 1000mm super fast lens will help a nature photographer but experts in those fields will get a good picture with almost anything.

Now if your reading this and thinking ‘well of course I know that’ then ask yourself the question ‘why aren’t you doing it’ because most of us blather on about photography being an art form, it being in the eye of the photographer blah blah blah but most of us (and I include me in that) are very often swayed by the idea that some new camera, new type of film, new lens will resolve our issues and make us better.
Of course if you are taking killer pics every week then you should move on because these articles are clearly not meant for you.

Me and a Konica in Japan
Travel broadens the mind and it’s usually cheaper than buying new gear too! Me on Koya Mountain, Japan with a trusty Konica S2. It may look warm but it was extremely cold – later on we nearly died on a mountain in a blizzard – the Konica was never the same again.

So, if you’re thinking your photography is at a dead end then get yourself a project or better yet spend some money on going places rather than  keep spending on gear which will only ever have a very nominal input to the quality of your photography.
 
I will be doing a series of articles on the theme of ‘being there’ across 2024 – this is just the first clip round the ear to maybe get you thinking about what you can be doing better. I’ll be looking at getting projects going and finishing up with people at the very sharp end of things.

Go away now and get some decent pictures because I swear if I see one more picture of ‘Tibbles’ the cat shot on some super rare classic I may just be forced to find out where you live and hand you an ‘observers book of the countryside’ and drag you kicking and screaming into it to do something creative. However if you’re sitting there getting angry and thinking ‘I can do better’ then good – go and do it and then this article will have achieved its purpose in getting your arse in gear. 

Posted on Leave a comment

Testament – Agfa Silette

Agfa Silitte

As a New Year comes in I get mellow and like to reflect on the years gone by, and hopefully the ones to come. On my mind today is a question and a reflection.

When is a camera more than a camera? What is any camera REALLY worth?

Sometimes, and this may happen only once in your life, you get to own a camera is more than the sum of its parts…

Such is ‘Agatha’ my Agfa Silette.  Alone of all the cameras I have owned this is the one I would never part with.  Agatha was bought by my father the year I was born. He was a manager at the Agfa plant and specialist film processing works in Wimbledon in the 1950s. He bought an Agfa Silette as a ‘happy snappy’.  Dad was a keen photographer, at one time a professional, and although he loved his TLR cameras he obviously thought a snap shooter would be a good tool to capture Birthdays and other family events as well as everyday life at the Agfa plant.

Through the years the Silitte captured birthdays, weddings, holidays, family excursions and much more besides. It’s hard to find a single family picture that wasn’t captured with the Silette.

Agfa Plant 1950s 1
Agfa Plant, Wimbledon in the 1950s snapped with the Silette.
Wimbledon Agfa Plant in the 1950s
Some of my ‘Aunties’ when I was a child – Laboratory staff at Agfa.

No family outing as a child was complete without the Silette wrapped around dads neck and over the years dad captured many hundreds of images of the family with using it.  It became almost a totem, endowed with semi-magical powers to recreate happy times and special events. 

A few times a year dad would get all of the slide film he had shot and processed and the family would sit down to watch a slide show of the recent outings and sometimes reflect on previous happy times too.  Remembering people forgotten from the past, places that had been visited, holidays we had enjoyed and, occasionally, some people and places we would rather forget. This was a simpler time, far removed from disposable digital images flashed onto social media in an instant and almost as quickly forgotten. Photography was special, an event, something to look forward to and enjoy.

Heathrow in the 1960s - a Vickers Vanguard
When air travel had glamour – 1960s a Vickers Vanguard at London Heathrow Airport.
Tenerife in the 1970s
Package holiday in Tenerife, 1974 – Snapped with the Silette by me from the hotel balcony.

Like any daughter my dad was my hero and as I grew up I too wanted to be able to take photographs for the family. For an early birthday dad bought me a Kodak Instamatic 33 but it was always a privilege to be able to use ‘Agatha’ the Agfa.  As I grew out of the Kodak dad used to let me use the Silette and taught me the rudiments of photography.  The basic rules of composure, aperture and speeds, depth of field, basic composition.  How to use flash to fill a scene, how to manage low light and so much more besides.

River Thames taken by Silette
River Thames and early morning mist – Taken by me in the 1980s with the Silette using HP5.

Such was the totemic power of the Silette that when dad was making his will I asked if the Silette could be mine for when he passed.  The Silette seemed to hold part of him in it.  Not just in its output of slide films but in the very metal, glass  and fabric that it was made from. It captured almost my entire life in film and when I think of dad the Silette is bonded indivisibly to the memory of him.

Nothing else was of value to me when dad passed – not money,  just this simple well made camera from the 1950s that taught me the basics of photography and recorded my life.

Sadly when dad passed the Lucimeter lightmeter and the accessory bulb flash gun had been lost or broken but the Silette was beautifully intact.

Today the Silette is seldom used but she still takes excellent sharp photographs and runs perfectly.  A faithful friend, never missing a beat, her shutter still within specification, her lens free of fungus. Her light seals are made from tougher stuff than Japanese foam and have never needed replacing. Though well used, to me, she she looks as lovely as the day she was made.

What is Agatha the Agfa Silette worth? To me she is priceless.  Just to hold her reminds me of my father and my childhood gone by in a way nothing else does or can. She brings back memories and lessons of photography under my fathers watchful eye. Occasionally I run film through her – using such a basic tool my instincts are sharpened for photography and she connects me to my fathers lessons all over again. Composing, watching the way the light plays, reading the shadows, holding my breath as I slowly press the shutter release.


When is a camera more than a camera? When they are an embodiment of a time gone before, a legacy and a testament to the past and a stepping stone to the future.

May I wish you all a happy snappy 2023 and may your God bless each and every one of you.

Agfa Silette

Posted on 4 Comments

A life in a lens

Life in a lens

A stroll through my cameras

Spring

Life in a lens

I started serious photography back in the halcyon days of 1972.  Back then, serious cameras cost serious money – my first pro SLR was the Olympus OM-1.  To give younger readers an idea of just how expensive this stuff was, my OM-1 cost almost as much as my first car! Most people back then didn’t have a color TV or a stereo, so cameras, especially SLRs, were naturally the preserve of the pros, the elite and those with a total passion for photography. Those who had neither the means nor inclination to own an SLR made do with an Instamatic – camera phones were 50 years away at the time. Add to this film processing costs and people were less inclined to take endless selfies and photographs of their dinner. Turns out the 70’s weren’t so bad after all.


Over the years I got to shoot film with most of the major brands and it’s interesting to me now, looking back, at how they came across back in the 1970s compared to today’s beardies and wunderkinds views on the web  – the new messiahs of the medium as they would have you believe. People new to film doing research as to what to buy may be interested as to how they were perceived by me (and plenty of others) back in the 1970s.

Pentax – the Granddaddy

The first commercially successful SLR whose basic layout set the standard for everyone else. Sadly by the 1970s they were looking old, tired and even the advertising featuring arch nice old duffer, tropical suit wearing, Mojita quaffing and pool side chat host Sir Alan Wicker only exasperated things. It typecast the camera as a thing a terribly nice old thing would buy. Few pros used Pentax and advertising implied it was designed for people who like a nice hot cup of cocoa before bed.

Nikon – Undisputed masters of the professional world.

Look at any press pack screaming for a comment on the news and they were all shooting Nikon. Out of reach price wise for any but pro press packers or hobbyists who were happy to live in a carboard box as the price of their passion. Undeniably the best, old and clunky definitely but undeniably desirable just for the name and its association with it being THE pros choice.

Canon – Hardly ever seen, and usually only the point and shoots.

The AE-1 was some way off and the FT series were looking VERY dated, like a Spotmatic but with a lead weight thrown in for free – if you needed to club a baby seal while out and about the FTb was perfect.

The AE-1 when it arrived was promoted by the sorts of sports people you might trust to kick a ball about but often had trouble stringing sentences together.  Buying a camera on the basis of a swimming champs recommendation seemed insane and confirmed its amateur status. The adverts made me cringe then and probably would now with the ‘I can’t believe I can use a camera’ coming from people who sounded like they would struggle with a toaster.

Minolta – Seen as amateur kit if they were seen at all. 

Few shops carried them apart from happy snappy type things or at best the rangefinders.  The SRT was on life support and it looked it.  The girl in her best outfit but with the wonky eye and pint of cider at the party that everyone is trying to avoid.  No motor drive capability doomed them as a pro camera. Of course, the 7000 series auto focus completely took everyone by surprise and was hugely successful, but to me with my smug mode turned fully on it just screamed amateur hour.  I can still remember a relative buying one and as they were a very skilled photographer I experienced the sort of shock you may feel if a relative told you they were going off to fight for a Marxist guerrilla group in South America!

Olympus – Brash new challenger. 

The bad boy of the pack, being bought by those who wanted to cock a snook at convention (me for instance), the outside fringe and those who wanted to be different (me again!). Of course, David Bailey was plugging them and who didn’t want to be David Bailey back then. I can remember walking out the shop with my first OM1 and thinking ‘well I am up there with the big boys now so out of the way peasant and go take some pictures of your cat with your Kodak 33′.

Over the next few years the league table of the manufacturers swayed this way and that but the basic view of these manufacturers wavered not one bit.

The Big Five Minus One - My Cameras
Typical camera fare from the mid 70s – These would have been amongst your choices

Summer

I sleep walked into being a pro photographer, alternating between being pro or doing a day job.  At times I would exhaust myself from pro work and lose the ‘edge’ so I would drop back to doing a 9-5.
The pro work was variable, mostly product photography, press work for local papers (Mayor and Z list celeb opens new Supermarket or Sophie wins best sponge cake at village fete), the occasional assignment for a small run magazine (Gas Mask Collector – Eric finds a rare Soviet gas mask at a flea market).  My gear increased of course and I moved up/down/sideways depending on brand loyalty from Olympus to Nikon. 

I got to use a few more cameras; the dreadful Olympus OM-4Ti, the horrid Canon T90, the ghastly Canon EoS which confirmed to me the soulless nature of all of Canons creations.

The shoot that finally banged the mausoleum door shut was a catalogue shoot. The company made so many changes it started to seem like I was in one of those repetitive nightmares.  The endless changes from the client turned what should have been a simple shoot into a quagmire of bland.

That was it – I was done with photography!

The Maldives
Late 89 taking a break from lens work. The break would turn out to last 10 years!

Autumn

I returned to photography at the turn of the millennium for a limited turn handling very specialised products but by 2010 I was done. For good this time I was sure! The pressures of the shoots became highly stressful and the demands from the people paying for the shoots increased. The rise of the web meant constant changes to shoots, constant demands for shoots of revised products and timescales to get work done shrunk to everyone wanting everything the day before yesterday!

The digital kit was sold off along with the studio gear and that was that. Peace at last!

Roll on 5 years….. I found myself in a junk shop and amongst the decaying bric-a-brac I spotted a Pentax KX.  It reminded me of my old Spotmatic. I picked it up to see if it was a runner and on a whim I decided to buy it for the princely sum of £12. Just holding it made me want to take pictures again so I stopped at a chemists and bought myself some film and started shooting.

The feel of a film SLR in my hands triggered all the old reflexes and made me want to be creative  – like a black and white print slowly emerging in developer I knew I was home.


I started to acquire more cameras as part of a small collection of iconic cameras from my 1970s salad days. It became obvious that a great many of them were sold by people who were completely clueless, or completely dishonest.
The endless online wails of people struggling with broken cameras made me realise I was not alone. Little by little I found myself drawn into the world of camera repair and refurbishment. In part this was because getting a professional technician involved was expensive.  I don’t begrudge paying for expertise but the economics of collecting forced me to consider doing work myself.  How hard could it be? Very hard if the last few years are any guide!

In Japan
In Japan with a restored Konica rangefinder. The Konica helped me break the ice in camera stores.

Starting with online guides and more enthusiasm than skill I busted quite a few things, but learnt useful lessons.  There’s an old saying, ‘those who make no mistakes make nothing’ However don’t take that principle too far. Of course, I have improved and now the odd challenge only serves to keep confidence balanced safely short of arrogance.

Minolta SRT 303b - My Cameras
A labour of love – a beautiful refurbished Minolta SRT303b after many hours work – now ready for a new home.

I started with lens repairs. Over time I built up a good selection of tools and practical experience of fixing lenses as well as cameras. I work mostly on Minoltas but have recently started to work with Pentax models. The longer term is taking a course allowing me to carry out more comprehensive works on wider selections of cameras.

Winter

Film is back – who would have thought it!

The current renaissance allows oldies like me to relive their youth and younger users get in on the zeitgeist. Sadly, from experience, I estimate as many as half the film cameras being sold are defective in some way.  Film is expensive and it’s frustrating to see people having endless problems when buying classic gear. Wasting film, processing costs and their time and often becoming disenchanted with the whole thing.

For many, the problem is self-inflicted  – expecting a mint camera for £30 from eBay to work out of the box. Most buyers have little appreciation of the fact that these cameras are operating way beyond their expected service life. Many are by now in dire need of servicing and attention.
How many 50-year-old complex machines that still work flawlessly do you own?

After a particularly frustrating experience with a camera from a dealer, I decided to start providing quality cameras. Cameras I had personally used and worked on to provide a better film experience for people. Allowing them to expand their photographic skills with film.

So, that’s my aim  – I want to be able to provide people with a known FULLY working camera. So that they can truly enjoy the film experience. As well as enjoying these beautiful cameras as much as I did the first time around. Now of course I am appreciating them all over again.

Minolta X Series - My Cameras
3 less than perfect cameras from eBay now beautifully restored
Minolta 58mm 1.4
Beautifully restored MC58mm
Woman at Work
Another batch of cameras and lenses ready to be bought back to life

It’s heartening seeing classics I learnt to shoot with are part of the wave of the future for many.  It’s good to see younger people getting back to film. I want to help them have the best possible experience they can have.

Check out the online store with a selection of cameras chosen by me and used by me. This shows you are buying from someone who not only knows cameras. As well as used them for a large part of their life but is truly passionate about them.

Earlier, I used the phrase ‘Current Renaissance’ and to me that’s how I feel about the resurgence of film.  But, if we are to have a lasting film community and not simply a fad it’s critical to keep this equipment running, the knowledge to use and repair it alive and to encourage younger people to get involved in film.

I spent a large part of my life using cameras. Now it seems fitting that I spend time repairing them for others to use.

Life for me has truly been a life through a lens – from both sides of it.